SIGNUP - FREE Membership and 1 FREE Sewing Lesson
| FAQ | Login
 

Platinum Sponsor
Fashion Fabrics Club
Fashion Fabrics Club

Forum > Pattern Modifications, Design Changes & Pattern Drafting > Interfacing or no interfacing?

Please LOGIN or Join PatternReview
Go to Page:
Interfacing or no interfacing?
ccris
ccris
Intermediate
Member since 10/27/05
Posts: 5002
Send Message

      



Date: 8/3/13 5:48 PM

On Kwik Sew 2388 (men's traditional button front pajamas with collar for woven fabric), I noticed the instructions didn't call for interfacing the front or collar. I read the PR reviews on this pattern, and no one mentioned it. I've never seen a pj pattern that didn't interface the front. There are piping directions or one can leave it plain, but I think the interfacing is needed since it's a button front. I know a piece of interfacing could be ironed on behind the buttons and buttonholes, but I thought it was unusual for a pattern to ignore this step, and more unusual that no one mentioned it in the reviews. Maybe I'm missing something. I don't know. This is an older Kwik Sew pattern.............probably 15 years old, at least. Any thoughts?

Miss Fairchild
starstarstarstar
Miss Fairchild
Advanced
USA
Member since 8/24/02
Posts: 7936
Send Message

      



In reply to ccris <<
thumbsup 1 member likes this.


Date: 8/3/13 6:50 PM

Does the front fold over several times, as in a self-fabric facing? If so, then it wouldn't need interfacing, as one layer of the fabric would do that. The pattern does state "scrap piece of fusible interfacing" but it doesn't say how much, nor the size.

Otherwise, I would think that the lack of interfacing is to make the pjs comfortable to wear while sleeping. You don't want a collar point stabbing you in the face while you are sleeping.

------
"Play the cards you are dealt, but choose who is sitting at the table"..AARP magazine

SEE MY ETSY SHOP HERE: http://www.etsy.com/shop/AuntMaymesAttic
My blog: http://auntmaymesattic.wordpress.com/

ccris
ccris
Intermediate
Member since 10/27/05
Posts: 5002
Send Message

      



Date: 8/4/13 0:34 AM

There's a pj front and a separate front facing, so the two make a double thickness of fabric........typical for traditional pj's. All traditional cotton woven RTW pj's we have (male and female alike) have interfaced fronts and collars, whether inexpensive or better quality, piped or plain. I have many pj patterns from Butterick, McCalls, and Simplicity. All of them call for interfaced (light) fronts and collars. BTW, none of these RTW interfaced pj collar points stab us. lol The interfacing doesn't make them stiff or uncomfortable at all. If RTW and other paper patterns companies use interfacing in these areas, it makes no sense to me why Kwik Sew eliminated it. Then again, maybe Kirsten Martensen knew something others didn't, and still don't, apparently. The KS misses 3553 and 2811 pj patterns don't use interfacing, either. So, it's definitely a Kwik Sew exclusive. I always thought interfacing was used to stabilize....especially buttons and buttonholes to keep the fabric from ripping, and in collars to keep them from looking crumpled. If I ever get around to making these, I'll probably use interfacing, regardless.

The scrap piece of interfacing is used behind the buttonholes for the drawstring in the pants. There's only a single thickness of fabric there. I wouldn't use the drawstring, but I think those buttonholes would have a lot of stress. Not sure how thy'd hold up over the long run.



mmcp
mmcp  Friend of PR
Advanced Beginner
Maryland USA
Member since 5/31/09
Posts: 283
Send Message

      



Date: 8/4/13 8:59 AM

They're not the only ones. I'm working on a button-front Burda shirt that left it out too.

SewLibra
star
SewLibra  Friend of PR
Intermediate
California USA
Member since 12/2/08
Posts: 710
Send Message

      
thumbsup 1 member likes this.



Date: 8/4/13 3:07 PM

I agree with Miss Fairchild. Pajamas should be soft and comfy, hence no interfacing. I often use very thin interfacing on daytime garments for comfort, as well.

------
SewLibra
Brother SB4138, Bernina 1008, Brother 1034D, Janome Harmony 9102D

Miss Fairchild
starstarstarstar
Miss Fairchild
Advanced
USA
Member since 8/24/02
Posts: 7936
Send Message

      



In reply to ccris <<


Date: 8/4/13 8:47 PM

I would bet Ms. Martensen knew more than we do. I know Peggy Sagers doesn't interface her blouse collars; watched a webcast where she brought this up. She said it wasn't necessary, especially if you wanted the collar to float more freely. Btu I've never come across a KwikSew pattern that didn't have interfacing.

I was trying to give a visual about the collar point.

------
"Play the cards you are dealt, but choose who is sitting at the table"..AARP magazine

SEE MY ETSY SHOP HERE: http://www.etsy.com/shop/AuntMaymesAttic
My blog: http://auntmaymesattic.wordpress.com/

Peter in NYC
starstarstarstar
Peter in NYC
Intermediate
USA
Member since 6/9/09
Posts: 331
Send Message

      
thumbsup 1 member likes this.



Date: 8/4/13 9:02 PM

Personally, I would interface the facing with something no heavier than my fashion fabric. It's not for stiffness, but to support the buttonholes. A lot depends on the weight of the fabric, too. A heavier flannel, for example, might not need the extra support. You might try making a buttonhole on a double layer of your fashion fabric and seeing how it turns out. You'll know whether you need that added layer or not, most probably.

------
You'll be in stitches at malepatternboldness.com!

Peter in NYC
starstarstarstar
Peter in NYC
Intermediate
USA
Member since 6/9/09
Posts: 331
Send Message

      
thumbsup 3 members like this.



Date: 8/4/13 9:04 PM

You might also consider using just a strip of interfacing immediately behind where the buttonholes will be rather than the entire facing. (But only if this isn't visible through the top layer of fabric.)

------
You'll be in stitches at malepatternboldness.com!

ccris
ccris
Intermediate
Member since 10/27/05
Posts: 5002
Send Message

      



Date: 8/10/13 0:01 AM

Oh geez, I forgot all about this thread. Thanks to all for your input. If I ever get around to sewing these, I'll probably use some kind of light interfacing. They used to carry a very lightweight fusible cotton interfacing, but I haven't seen it around in years. I just found it a bit odd that all three Kwik Sew pj patterns didn't require it, but three of the big 4 did (at least in the ones I have). Vogue doesn't have a pj pattern. Never checked Burda.

Go to Page:
Please LOGIN or Join PatternReview

printable version Printable Version

* Advertising and soliciting is strictly prohibited on PatternReview.com. If you find a post which is not in agreement with our Terms and Conditions, please click on the Report Post button to report it. Pattern Modifications, Design Changes & Pattern Drafting >> Interfacing or no interfacing?

 
adv. search»
pattern | machine | member
        
Understanding Wool Fabrics
Understanding Wool Fabrics

Register

Beginners Guide to Sewing Jackets
Beginners Guide to Sewing Jackets

Register

McCall's 4548

photo
by: Mint Choco...

Review
Kwik Sew 1672

photo
by: Doobee64

Review
Jamie Christina Hooded Scarf Pattern (JC307HS)

Jamie Christina Hooded Scarf Pattern (JC307HS)

Buy Now
Favorite Things The Cargo Tote Pattern

Favorite Things The Cargo Tote Pattern

Buy Now

Conditions of Use | Posting Guidelines | Privacy Policy | Shipping Rates | Returns & Refunds | Contact Us | About | New To PR | Advertising

Copyright © 2014 PatternReview.com® , OSATech, Inc. All rights reserved.