Tailypo said... Really nice looking top -- and thanks for the heads-up about the error.
Tell me, when you make a top like this, do you make an effort to match the print on the ruffle to the print on the bodice? 5/31/05 11:23 PM
SueV said... Nope, didn't attempt to match anything. I just made sure there wasn't a big flower on the center of the breast. 5/31/05 11:31 PM
mudcat said... Lovely top. The unhemmed ruffle looks fine in the picture, but how does it look up close? I have this pattern but am not totally comfortable with not hemming. 5/31/05 11:40 PM
Levone said... Pretty top. 6/1/05 1:58 AM
jlg said... So pretty and feminine. This turned out great. 6/1/05 6:01 AM
BjP said... This is a great looking top.....very pretty and fits you well. 6/1/05 7:29 AM
KarmenG said... Love that top - it looks wonderful on you. 6/1/05 7:36 AM
Debbie Cook said... Beautiful top and great fabric choice! The fit looks perfect. 6/1/05 8:03 AM
Gigi Louis said... I love your top - it's very pretty on you. 6/1/05 8:17 AM
MickeyFan said... Very pretty top. I think I'll add this CJ to my wish list. 6/1/05 8:35 AM
Mary Stiefer said... Great looking top. Do you nofity the pattern company that they have an error? This happened to me once and when I notified the pattern company they reported back that the error was fixed in later versions of the pattern. 6/1/05 9:07 AM
SueV said... I like the unhemmed ruffle, it looks good. I wasn't too sure about not hemming either, but it looks good and I think hemming would add bulk and take away from the top.
Yes, I notified CJ Patterns of the error.
Thanks! This really is a great pattern and nice top; I can see several of them in my future! 6/1/05 10:10 AM
PixieCat said... Such a beautiful top! I like the ruffle detail. 6/2/05 3:55 AM
Barbara at Cat Fur Studio said... The top looks great on you. Nice job!! 6/2/05 7:13 AM
LilD said... Sue, a lovely top. I have hoped to make this pattern and your review has pushed me to "get it done" Thanks 6/3/05 2:32 PM
Teri said... What a cute top. I am tempted to try it! 6/5/05 9:55 PM
Debra H said... Thanks for a great review of a pattern I am considering. I did think it was going to be too lowcut, so glad to know it is not. 8/27/05 10:21 AM
Really nice looking top -- and thanks for the heads-up about the error. Tell me, when you make a top like this, do you make an effort to match the print on the ruffle to the print on the bodice?
5/31/05 11:23 PM
Nope, didn't attempt to match anything. I just made sure there wasn't a big flower on the center of the breast.
5/31/05 11:31 PM
Lovely top. The unhemmed ruffle looks fine in the picture, but how does it look up close? I have this pattern but am not totally comfortable with not hemming.
5/31/05 11:40 PM
Pretty top.
6/1/05 1:58 AM
So pretty and feminine. This turned out great.
6/1/05 6:01 AM
This is a great looking top.....very pretty and fits you well.
6/1/05 7:29 AM
Love that top - it looks wonderful on you.
6/1/05 7:36 AM
Beautiful top and great fabric choice! The fit looks perfect.
6/1/05 8:03 AM
I love your top - it's very pretty on you.
6/1/05 8:17 AM
Very pretty top. I think I'll add this CJ to my wish list.
6/1/05 8:35 AM
Great looking top. Do you nofity the pattern company that they have an error? This happened to me once and when I notified the pattern company they reported back that the error was fixed in later versions of the pattern.
6/1/05 9:07 AM
I like the unhemmed ruffle, it looks good. I wasn't too sure about not hemming either, but it looks good and I think hemming would add bulk and take away from the top. Yes, I notified CJ Patterns of the error. Thanks! This really is a great pattern and nice top; I can see several of them in my future!
6/1/05 10:10 AM
Such a beautiful top! I like the ruffle detail.
6/2/05 3:55 AM
The top looks great on you. Nice job!!
6/2/05 7:13 AM
Sue, a lovely top. I have hoped to make this pattern and your review has pushed me to "get it done" Thanks
6/3/05 2:32 PM
What a cute top. I am tempted to try it!
6/5/05 9:55 PM
Thanks for a great review of a pattern I am considering. I did think it was going to be too lowcut, so glad to know it is not.
8/27/05 10:21 AM