Pattern with more than 5 reviews!
|Folkwear: 130 (Australian Bush Outfit) - Type:Mens - Pants |
|Viewed 48 times
Review rated Very Helpful
by 3 people
|About piet |
|Member since: 5/6/12 |
|Reviews written: 4|
|patterns reviewed: 4|
|Posted on:||1/11/14 7:48 PM |
|Last Updated:||1/11/14 7:52 PM|
|Pattern Rating:||Highly Recommend |
|Fabric:||Wool Woven [See other projects in this fabric]|
|Related Links |
|Click on to add a link|
|I am on a quest to make highly effective trousers. I teach small children, and I like to wear military cargo trousers. I thought the pants part of this outfit pattern set might fit the bill. |
I really like that the pattern is printed on nice stiff white paper not that different from what you might put in your printer. None of this awful tissue-y stuff for me!
I am not certain why pattern places only one cargo pocket on the legs. It's no problem to double this and put one on the other leg. Perhaps the pattern is reiterating a historical precedent. It seems to be based on aspects of "battle dress" issued to British troops in WWII [which is part of its attraction for me].
The instructions for the welted hip pockets just seem totally cattywumpus to me. I used the method I learned from a Kwik Sew pattern.
The cut of the flaps on hip pockets and cargo pocket[s] is attractive, practical, and the 2 match to each other. The pocket placement and size is good, though oddly the user is directed to make the pockets on the women's version smaller.
The pattern says it is _sized_ but not tailored for women or for men. It's cut for men.
The cut is baggy in the legs. That's fine. It is also very generous in the crotch. This is good for moving around-- the fabric does not pull when you squat, but counter-intuitively, the low crotch feels like it can be restrictive at times. There is such a thing as too much of a good thing. The loos crotch is not totally excessive, but it might snag on a bicycle saddle at times.
The button fly is straightforward in construction and clean in appearance.
The weird double buckle affair used to close the waist when worn is disgusting. Dang! What do they think I have in there that has to be so tightly strapped down!! I changed to 2 buttons, one over the other, in front, and a single button fastening the end of the outer belt down. The inner belt I did away with completely. Still, when I need to use the restroom quickly during recess, the extra button on the belt is not my favourite. I might remove it.
If I recall correctly, the pattern does not have belt loops. I added them because I was raised never to go out without a belt.
The pants seem to be intended to fit around the belly just below the navel. I usually want to wear them a little lower. This might be part of the baggy crotch effect.
<< Previous Next >>
Login to Add a Comment